HAL4SDV Project Successfully Concluded the Second Review Meeting

On June 25–26, the HAL4SDV consortium gathered in Munich, Germany, for the project’s second official review meeting. This important milestone brought partners together to share progress, exchange insights, and align on the next steps toward achieving our project objectives.
Over the course of two productive days, the consortium:
· Reviewed advancements across all Work Packages
· Discussed key transversal activities
· Showcased progress in our Use Cases
A highlight of the meeting was the visit to the TUM laboratory, where participants explored the test bench and experienced a live demonstration of the Lotus Eletre (Use Case 1, ZF). In addition, the Virtual Vehicle team presented a Xen-virtualized reference hardware platform on ARM, based on a Dom0less architecture and deployed on an AD/AI model vehicle.
The review meeting provided a valuable opportunity to reflect on the progress achieved so far and to prepare for presenting our results to expert reviewers. The discussions, demonstrations, and feedback received will play a key role in guiding the project through its next phase.
We would like to sincerely thank all consortium partners for their active participation, as well as their high-quality presentations and demonstrations.
On behalf of the entire HAL4SDV team, we also extend our gratitude to our Project Officer, Georgi Kuzmanov, and to reviewers Zlatko Petrov and Cornel Klein for their insightful comments, advice, and recommendations. Their guidance will be instrumental as we continue working toward the successful completion of the project.
©HAL4SDV

HAL4SDV receives funding within the Chips Joint Undertaking (Chips JU) - the Public-Private Partnership for research, development and innovation under Horizon Europe – and National Authorities under grant agreement n° 101139789.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the granting authority. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.









